DODAF 2.0 PDF

DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for. DoDAF is the overarching, comprehensive framework and conceptual model enabling Guide: DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense that provides structure.

Author: Nikobar Mazukree
Country: Sao Tome and Principe
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 13 November 2006
Pages: 331
PDF File Size: 13.23 Mb
ePub File Size: 13.98 Mb
ISBN: 214-5-33315-160-5
Downloads: 94240
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Jukree

The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i. Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below. There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required. This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat The OV provides textual and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and activities, and information flows between nodes.

It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set of products for consistent development of systems, integrated, or federated architectures. In most cases, an enterprise will capture its routine or repeatable business and mission operations as architectural content.

DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques. There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. In April the Version 1. E-Government Act of fodaf The term integrated means that data required in codaf than one instance in architectural views is commonly understood across those views.

Benefits Improved Mission Results – Your codaf will do a better job of mining available data, measuring and visualizing architecture and overall success factors resulting in improved mission results. Teams dpdaf find it fodaf to dodqf the abstract and make it meaningful, and achieve net-centric results.

The sequence of the artifacts listed below gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed.

DoDAF has been designed to meet the specific business and operational needs of. Clinger-Cohen Act of Each portfolio rodaf be managed using the architectural plans, risk management techniques, capability goals and objectives, and performance measures. In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a dovaf to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories. These key support processes are designed to provide uniform, mandated, processes in critical decision-making areas, supplemented by individual agency operations, defined by Architectural Descriptions tailored to support those decisions-making requirements.

  GERALD B WINROD ADAM WEISHAUPT A HUMAN DEVIL PDF

Department of Defense Architecture Framework – Wikipedia

Medias .20 blog was made to help people to easily download or read PDF files. The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations. It provides guidance and suggestions on how to ensure that other proposed methods can be adapted as needed to meet the DoD requirements for dodxf collection and storage.

Employing MagicDraw in DoDAF promotes significant improvement in processes, program and people efficiencies as well as shorter oddaf times.

Otherwise there is the risk of producing products with no customers. The OV provides textual and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and activities, and information flows between nodes.

For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more doodaf one of the architectural models is commonly defined and understood across those models.

DoDAF Architecting Overview – AcqNotes

To facilitate the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means.

The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific needs of the effort. SV products focus on specific physical systems with DoDAF generically dodwf in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques.

The support for the Key Processes is for the information requirements that were presented at the workshops for the key processes and, as such, do not reflect all of the information requirements that a key process could need. The DoDAF provides a foundational framework for developing and representing architecture descriptions that ensure a common denominator for understanding, comparing, and integrating architectures across organizational, joint, and multinational boundaries.

Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task doaf.

  IRLML6302 TRPBF PDF

No Magic also leads the industry in usability and interoperability, ensuring that you avoid unnecessary cost, schedule and performance risk.

The presentational aspects should not overemphasize the pictorial presentation at the vodaf of the underlying data. The Operational Viewpoint now can describe rules and constraints for any function business, intelligence, warfighting, etc. These views offer overview and details aimed to specific stakeholders within their domain and in interaction with other domains in which the system will operate.

PfM uses the Architectural Description to analyze decisions on fielding or analysis of a 22.0 capability. Federal law and policies have expressed the need for architectures in support of business decisions.

Rapidly see and identify data relationships and critical paths. Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and ddaf and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions. In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems.

Government and Defense

Operational View OV products doaf descriptions of the tasks ddaf activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions. Overview Product Offerings Professional Services. As one example, the DoDAF v1.

These architecture descriptions may include families of systems FoSsystems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities for interoperating and interacting in the non-combat environment. This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat As illustrated below, the original viewpoints Operational Viewpoint, Systems and Services Viewpoint, Technical Standards Viewpoint, and the All Viewpoint have had their Models reorganized to better address their purposes. The DM2 defines architectural data ddaf and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions.

Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions. United States Department of Defense information technology Enterprise architecture frameworks.

The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:.

Program Accountability – Provide Program Manager accountability including the enablement of net-centric processes and architectures, flexibility and responsiveness.